Sunday, August 20, 2006
Peace, Inc.
Why not, when nations have already lost the monopoly of violence, consider creating volunteer mercenary forces organized by private corporations to fight wars on a contract-fee basis for the United Nations - the condottieri of yesterday armed with some of the weapons, including non-lethal weapons, of tomorrow?
Governments unwilling to send their own young men and women to die in combat against Serbian, Croat, or Bosnian irregulars, including rapists and genocidal thugs, might have had fewer reservations about allowing the UN to contract with a nonpolitical, professional fighting force made up of volunteers from many nations - a rapid-deployment unit for hire. Or one under contract to the UN alone.
Of course, to prevent such companies from becoming wild cards, strict international ground rules would have to be set - transnational boards of directors, public monitoring of their funds, perhaps special arrangements to lease them equipment for specific purposes, rather than allowing them to build up gigantic warstocks of their own. But if governments cannot directly do the job the world may well turn to corporations that can.
By contrast, one might also imagine the creation, someday, of internationally chartered 'Peace Corporations,' each of which is assigned some region of the globe. Instead of being paid for waging war, its sole source of profit would come from war limitation in its region. Its 'product' would be reduced casualty numbers as measured against some recent base-line period.
Special, internationally sanctioned rules could permit these companies wide military and moral latitude to conduct unorthodox peacekeeping operations - to do what it takes, ranging from legalized bribery to propaganda to limited military intervention, to the supply of peacemaking forces in the region. Private investors might be found to capitalize such firms if, say, the international community or regional groups greed to pay them a fee for services plus bonanza profits in years when casualties decline. And if this doesn't work, perhaps there are other ways to seed the world with highly motivated peace-preserving institutions. Why not make peace pay off?Governments unwilling to send their own young men and women to die in combat against Serbian, Croat, or Bosnian irregulars, including rapists and genocidal thugs, might have had fewer reservations about allowing the UN to contract with a nonpolitical, professional fighting force made up of volunteers from many nations - a rapid-deployment unit for hire. Or one under contract to the UN alone.
Of course, to prevent such companies from becoming wild cards, strict international ground rules would have to be set - transnational boards of directors, public monitoring of their funds, perhaps special arrangements to lease them equipment for specific purposes, rather than allowing them to build up gigantic warstocks of their own. But if governments cannot directly do the job the world may well turn to corporations that can.
By contrast, one might also imagine the creation, someday, of internationally chartered 'Peace Corporations,' each of which is assigned some region of the globe. Instead of being paid for waging war, its sole source of profit would come from war limitation in its region. Its 'product' would be reduced casualty numbers as measured against some recent base-line period.
from 'War and Anti-War' by Alvin & Heidi Toffler
A related article:
The United Nations dithers as genocide goes on in Darfur and the Congo. Private security firms can end the killing, if anyone will let them...
The United Nations dithers as genocide goes on in Darfur and the Congo. Private security firms can end the killing, if anyone will let them...
Post a Comment
Excerpts | Blog Template by Gecko & Fly